 |
| VeryDarkMan’s moment of freedom |
Martins Otse—widely known as VeryDarkMan—has been released from the custody of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) after meeting bail conditions. His arrest sparked a nationwide debate on free speech and due process. This report traces the chain of events from his detention to his release, and gauges expert views on the road ahead.
Otse rose to fame as a social media commentator. He drew large followings on Instagram and TikTok with his frank talk on politics, crime, and social issues. He earned praise for holding public figures to account. But his fiery style also drew scrutiny.
On Friday, May 2, 2025, EFCC agents in Abuja arrested VeryDarkMan over a string of petitions alleging cyberstalking and hate speech. The petitions claimed he used his platform to defame individuals and spread false claims. EFCC spokesperson Dele Oyewale confirmed an order to detain him for questioning.
According to EFCC, the complaints against Otse included:
Cyberstalking: Unfounded claims that targeted private citizens.
Defamation: Publishing names and photos without evidence.
Potential financial fraud: Alleged links to spam fund drives (still unproven).
The agency obtained a valid remand order from court, citing the need to probe these matters.
Otse’s lawyer, Deji Adeyanju, secured administrative bail on Monday, May 5, but lamented delays in formal release papers. EFCC granted bail pending trial, but must issue documents within 48 hours. Adeyanju said the hold‑up violated Otse’s rights under the Administration of Criminal Justice Act.
Bail Conditions:
1. Deposit of ₦2 million.
2. Surrender of travel documents.
3. Regular reporting at EFCC office.
News of Otse’s arrest and bail spread fast on social media. Key voices joined the fray:
King Tunde Ednut: Called the arrest “a sign of fear in high places” and urged immediate free speech protections.
Mark Angel: Demanded EFCC publish proof of invitation before the arrest.
Davido and Seun Kuti: Praised Otse’s bold stance and warned of chilling effects on activism.
Atiku Abubakar (PDP): Criticized the EFCC’s move as heavy‑handed and called for a review of bail procedures.
Constitutional Lawyer, Prof. Amina Yusuf:
“This case tests the balance between free speech and defamation law. The EFCC should fast‑track such matters to avoid needless detention.”
“Influencers now face real legal risks. This will push many to self‑censor unless legal guardrails are clear.”
In its press release, EFCC stated it acted on “credible petitions” and would pursue thorough investigations. It affirmed Otse’s right to bail and pledged to produce formal papers. The agency urged citizens to use lawful channels for redress.
May 7 dawned with supporters gathering outside EFCC offices. Otse emerged mid‑morning, smiling and thanking Nigerians for their support. He vowed to return to his platform with renewed vigor. “I go continue speak truth,” he told reporters.
What’s Next?
Court Date: Otse is set to appear on Thursday, May 9, on charges of cyberstalking and defamation.
Evidence Review: EFCC must share any proof with the court.
Public Debate: Calls grow for clear rules on social‐media conduct.
Otse’s case underscores a larger debate in Nigeria and beyond: how to balance open debate with protection from online harm. Legal experts urge fast‑track rules for influencer speech and clearer guidelines on petition procedures.
VeryDarkMan’s release marks a victory for timely bail rights. His case will shape how activist‑commentators operate under threat of swift detention. As Otse heads back online, Nigerians and watchers abroad will watch closely—this is more than one man’s story. It is a test of speech, law, and trust in institutions.