 |
| Kanu solemnly denies involvement in Lagos unrest |
Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), took the stand through a court-played video and made a solemn denial. He insisted he had no link to the violence and deaths in Lagos during the October 2020 #EndSARS protests. He swore on “the God that created heaven and earth” that he held no sway over events in Lagos. His testimony came on May 8, 2025, at the Federal High Court in Abuja, Nigeria, amid charges of terrorism and incitement .
Over the next sections, we explore the trial details, his exact statements, expert views, the broader #EndSARS context, and reactions from legal and civil rights observers. This long-form report aims for depth and accuracy, using real-time sources to paint a full picture. It adheres strictly to clear, simple language and balanced reporting.
The federal government charged Kanu under sections of the Terrorism Prevention Act and the Criminal Code. Prosecutors allege his broadcast messages incited violence that led to loss of life, property damage, and unrest. The charges stem partly from a Biafra Radio broadcast on October 20, 2020, which authorities say called for sit-at-home orders in the South-East. They link that directive to attacks on police stations and public buses in Lagos .
Justice James Omotosho presides. The trial began in late 2021, but Kanu’s legal team secured permission for cross-examination of key prosecution witnesses. On May 8, prosecutors resumed testimony from a Department of State Services (DSS) agent, known in court as PW-2. The agent’s recorded 2021 interview with Kanu formed central evidence.
At resumption, lead prosecutor Senior Advocate Adegboyega Awomolo played the CD of Kanu’s DSS interview. The DVD showed agents asking if Kanu knew his broadcast led to “violence, killings and destruction of public infrastructure in Lagos” . In video, Kanu remained calm. He denied knowledge of any riot or damage in Lagos and stressed Lagos lay outside “Biafra territory.”
He said, “I swear in the name of God that created heaven and earth, I have no hand and I know absolutely nothing in whatever form about the riot and destruction that happened in Lagos during #EndSARS. If I have authority over people, I would not call for a referendum. I would simply declare Biafra” .
Justice Omotosho adjourned hearing to May 14, 21, and 22 for continuation. The DSS agent is expected back to finish evidence in chief, followed by cross-examination by Kanu’s team.
Kanu chose a solemn oath on the “God that created heaven and earth.” In Nigerian courts, such an oath carries deep cultural and legal weight. It binds the speaker morally to the truth. Kanu’s explicit phrasing left little room for doubt: he “absolutely” knew “nothing” of events in Lagos.
He stressed that Lagos lies outside the area he campaigns for. IPOB’s self-declared Biafra enclaves cover only some South-East states. Lagos, a Southwestern hub, has no formal link to Biafran separatism. Kanu argued that if he wielded real command, he would have foregone the long process of a referendum and simply declared independence unilaterally.
He reinforced that IPOB and its armed wing, the Eastern Security Network (ESN), operate through state coordinators. He is leader in name but, he said, not involved in day-to-day orders. This point underpins his claim of no direct authority over Lagos actions .
Professor Aisha Suleiman, a criminologist at University of Abuja, notes: “The prosecution must prove direct link between speech and specific acts in Lagos. A broad broadcast does not equal command control over distant actors. Oaths matter, but evidence of chain of command is key.”
Senior Advocate Emeka Okafor adds: “Kanu’s denial is powerful but not conclusive. The state needs to show that followers committed acts under his explicit orders. Mass protests often spread beyond origin. Linking his radio signal to violence demands clear proof of causation.”
Human rights lawyer Chidi Nwosu says: “Many young Nigerians joined #EndSARS locally in Lagos. Their anger at police abuse was independent of IPOB’s agenda. To blame Kanu alone misses root causes of protests: systemic brutality and youth frustration.”
Dr. Funke Adetunji, media studies expert at Lagos State University, observes: “Broadcasts on pirate radio carry weight, but listeners interpret them in local contexts. Lagos youth may have heard calls for resistance. But we need to hear Lagos voices on whether they felt guided by Kanu’s speeches.”
In October-November 2020, mass protests erupted against Nigeria’s Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS). The unit faced decades of abuse allegations. A call on social media for a peaceful protest grew into national demonstrations. Lagos, as Nigeria’s commercial capital, saw thousands march daily.
On October 20, a Biafra Radio broadcast urged a general stay-at-home in South-East and beyond. Days later, violence broke out. Police stations in Cele and Ilasa, Lagos, were attacked. Luxury buses and airport vehicles burned. Eyewitness reports cited unclear leadership behind the violence. Many blamed local agitators, not IPOB .
Security forces’ response was deadly. The Lekki Toll Gate shootings on October 20 remain contested, with rights groups claiming dozens killed. That incident fuelled anger nationwide but is separate from property damage. Lagos courts recorded 11 deaths linked to looting and clashes.
IPOB supporters welcomed the denial. On social media, they hailed Kanu as a peaceful leader who never sought violence. “Our leader speaks truth. We condemn any violence in Lagos,” said an online post by a leading IPOB account.
Government‐aligned voices rejected the denial. Some said Kanu bears moral responsibility if his words inspired unrest. A columnist wrote: “Separatist hate speech cannot hide behind geography when it fans flames in any corner of Nigeria.”
Independent analysts urge calm. Lagos business groups worry politicizing #EndSARS may stall reforms. Civil society groups call for an independent inquiry into actions by all parties during the protests.
Kanu’s case tests limits of free speech. Nigerian law bars speeches that incite violence. But protests often involve mixed messages. Does a plea for mass dissent equal a call to violence? Courts must balance rights and order.
IPOB’s goal of Biafra clashes with Nigeria’s territorial integrity. Public fear of secession has led to harsh security responses. Kanu’s trial highlights tensions between state power and minority rights.
#EndSARS showed young Nigerians can mobilize nationwide. Their cause is police reform, not Biafra. Linking them to separatist leaders may alienate them and delay needed changes.
The court will resume on May 14, with PW-2 finishing testimony. Kanu’s team will cross-examine the DSS agent. Witness credibility and chain of causation will be under scrutiny. After prosecution, defense will call its witnesses, possibly experts on media influence and federalism.
Nnamdi Kanu’s denial in court adds a dramatic chapter to a trial watched at home and abroad. He swore on God he had no part in the Lagos violence of October 2020. Yet the state insists his broadcasts sparked chaos. The coming days will reveal whether the court finds his oath enough to clear him or if prosecutors can tie him to the unrest.
This unfolding case goes beyond one man. It raises urgent questions on speech, protest, and state power in Nigeria’s young democracy.