The nickname "Baba-go-slow" isn’t just a light hearted jab. It's almost like a mirror to Tinubu’s pace since taking office a pace that some find reassuringly deliberate, and others, well, frustratingly sluggish. It’s like Tinubu’s walking a tightrope; balancing between making careful moves and addressing mounting issues that can’t afford to wait.
The “Emilokan” mantra that helped bring Tinubu to power (meaning “it’s my turn”) promised action, yet there are still voices saying, “Hey, we’re waiting here!” Obasanjo’s remark taps into this sentiment, resonating with a portion of Nigerians who feel progress on key fronts, like economic recovery and infrastructure, is still more talk than action.
But let’s give Tinubu some credit. Leading Nigeria is no cakewalk. The country's challenges are complex, like untangling a knot that keeps looping back on itself. And who’s to say a cautious approach isn’t a smart one, especially in a climate where one misstep could derail more than just a reputation? Some argue that, given Nigeria’s delicate situation, a ‘slow and steady’ method is necessary. But then, there’s also the real pressure of time waiting too long might mean missed opportunities.
On social media, the debate is electric. People are asking, does Nigeria need a “quick-fix” leader or someone who will take their time to get things right? Is it possible to strike a balance between the two? No doubt, Obasanjo’s words will add fuel to these discussions, sparking reflections on what the country truly needs right now.
Perhaps, in his own way, Obasanjo has nudged the nation to think beyond personalities and into the heart of governance. With a little humor, he’s raised a question we’re all pondering: When it comes to steering Nigeria, is it better to be bold or careful?
Tags
Baba-go-slow
Bola Ahmed Tinubu
Leadership Styles
News
Nigeria Politics
Obasanjo vs Tinubu
Olusegun Obasanjo