![]() |
Court enforces strict silence on ongoing case. |
A new court order has paused all public statements in a key Senate lawsuit. On Friday, Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court in Abuja told Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, Senate President Godswill Akpabio, and other parties to avoid media interviews about this ongoing case.
The judge gave this order to ensure a fair hearing. She wants both sides to focus on legal arguments instead of news debates. This means no public chats, TV spots, or social posts about the lawsuit. The judge said the restriction will stay until the final verdict.
Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan brought this case to halt a Senate inquiry into her activities. She claims that the probe is unfair. The court aims to review her arguments and the Senate’s defense without outside pressure. Lawyers for both sides accepted the media ban. They plan to stick to court channels.
According to the Federal High Court schedule (verified as of April 4, 2025), the next hearing is set for May 12, 2025. The court will then review fresh filings and address any pending motions. Court records confirm that no extra details will be shared until that date.
Some legal experts see this ban as a way to protect the integrity of the proceedings. They note that media discussions can shift public perception. They also say that judges prefer calm settings while handling sensitive cases. Many experts suggest this approach might help avoid distractions.
Supporters of Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan want the court to lift her Senate suspension. They argue that she has faced enough setbacks. Meanwhile, the Senate leadership believes its internal rules allow such an inquiry. Both sides will now rely on court hearings to present their positions.
Analysts predict this case could affect future Senate investigations. If Akpoti-Uduaghan wins, other suspended lawmakers may follow the same path. If she loses, the Senate’s authority to investigate members could grow stronger. Either way, the final outcome will shape how lawmakers handle internal conflicts.
Observers advise everyone to watch official court updates for reliable facts. This media blackout will stay in place until Justice Nyako issues a clear decision. In the meantime, the public can track the case through verified legal bulletins and court notices.
Court watchers expect a thorough process. They say the judge will likely weigh each claim carefully. While the ban may feel strict, many believe it helps maintain order. Each party will get a fair chance to speak in court without media pressure.
For now, the main takeaway is the strict pause on any press remarks. The court wants to avoid swaying opinions. Any breach of this order could lead to contempt charges. Lawyers on both sides must respect the judge’s rules or risk penalties.
Stay tuned for official updates. Once the court issues its next ruling, details will become public. Until then, this legal standoff continues behind closed doors.